Strevens begins by outlining perhaps the two most influential ways of approaching science: a system of pure, dispassionate rationality, undermined to the extent that any bias or personal feeling is involved (exemplified by Karl Popper's view) vs. a system inherently tied to the tastes of a community, tastes which cannot be rationally compared (exemplified by Thomas Kuhn's view). But the real value of this book is not merely a careful retelling of both the history of science and the history of the philosophy of science, but how he uses that discussion to formulate a view that sits between the Popperians and Kuhnians.
Beyond what Strevens explicitly discusses, this is a great example of complex behavior: irrational individuals (scientists) can form rational systems (science).
What is a mind? What is cognition? What does it mean to think? I'm sure you already have views on all of this, it's almost impossible not to. Some of those views are probably clear in your head, things you've considered explicitely, maybe even gone back and forth on. But other aspects of your approach are invisible to you. There are assumptions you haven't unearthed. (If you think this isn't true for you, then it's especially true for you.) These assumptions are the ultimate target of PGS's Other Minds.
Octopuses (and their relatives like cuttlefish) are the only intelligent creatures in the known universe that have evolved intelligence and cognition independently from our lineage. In a sense, intelligence evolved twice: in human's predecessors and in octopuses' predecessors. This makes octopuses quite possibly the closest thing we can get to alien intelligence. As such, they provide a beautiful case study for investigating what we think intelligence, consiousness, identity, etc. really are.
John Dewey has a famous idea that the various arts are ways of crystalizing forms of human experience. Paintings crystalize a visual experience. Songs crystalize audible experience. Books, as Martha Nussbaum points out, crystalize narrative experience. In G:AaA, Nguyen argues that games (sports, table top, video) crystalize agency. Works of art are ways of framing particular aspects of human experience, and one crucial aspect is what it's like to have a certain set of abilities with which to overcome obstacles. His analysis includes numerous helpful frameworks and distinctions which ultimately find application in analyzing the gamification of life as well as the mentality of conspiracy theorists.
Forewarning, this book is more dense than you might expect from a book about games. It doesn't shy away from substantive and hard fought debates in the philosophy of aesthetics. In doing so, it provides an entry point from which to see the numerous ways in which we can discuss art. If you think philosophy of art is just about "Is art objective?", this book will forcefully introduce you to a much deeper and more complex world.
Mercier and Sperber start with a double-enigma: First, if the capacity to reason is so useful, then why haven't other animals evolved to do it? Second, why are humans, with all of their cognitive biases, so seemingly bad at reasoning? These questions lead the authors into an investigation of what reason is, what intuition is, what a self is, and more. Ultimately, they dispense with the idea of a "stage" which thoughts come across and develop an account in which reasons are originally and still primarily social.
"Correlation is not causation!" Yeah, we know... So then, what is causation? Traditional statistics has nervously shied away from this question in favor of merely recording data and their relationships. The Causal Revolution, which Pearl and his students began only a few decades ago, provides mathematical rigor to concepts that for centuries have been plagued with paradox, and as a result, has significantly impacted the worlds of artificial intelligence and machine learning.
P(H|E)=P(E|H)*P(H)/P(E), also known as Bayes' Theorem, holds a special place in many people's heart. They are known as Bayesians. To those people, the theorem simultaneously solves some of the deepest mysteries of philosophy, dissolves paradoxes in the foundations of science, and describes how a thinking mind ought to deal with evidence. And while not everyone agrees on these philosophical points, no one denies the practical impact of Bayes' Theorem on virtually every discipline that concerns statistics. However Bayes' Theorem had trouble ever coming to light. McGrayne explores the real history behind it, and how it had to prove its mettle in the most real world scenario possible: World War II.
Since Oppenheimer (2023) reminded us that we are all physicists in our spare time, you might be left needing to scratch the itch of engaging material coupled with a legitimate explanation of some of the most important and hardest concepts in physics. The Nobel laureate Lederman is not only an expert on the topic but also in the accessibility of his writing. Yes, by the end, you will understand why the Higgs boson is so important, and you won't have to do any math.
Mathematics was in an existential crisis. At the turn of the 20th century, mathematicians were panicking that their entire enterprise, the very field of mathematics, might crumble as a result of its own devises. Logicomix is a fun-to-read, semi-biographical graphic novel that traces the efforts of Bertrand Russell to build foundations of mathematics in logic while guarding against paradoxes. The results of his and others' efforts is not only a firm foundation of mathematics, but the building blocks for modern computers.
Shenefelt & White trace the history of logic from its discovery in Ancient Greece to its underpinning of modern computing. This book is an easy read that helps tie together historical, philosophical, and practical matters to provide the reader a more well-rounded grasp of perhaps the most important science there is.
This book does two things: First, it explains the concept of many model thinking in which a thinker utilizes a library of models (never just one) to understand real world dynamics and events. Second, it provides a library of models to do so. After reading, the book serves as a toolbelt of models that can be used to analyze countless situations across essentially any domain.
This is a good handbook to keep near your desk if starting out in analytic philosophy. Analytic philosophers have developed many tools for carefully handling things. There are countless concepts that people use intuitively and colloquially but experts use carefully and with explicit definitions. Papineau has gathered an impressive number of these into this short book.
Writing is hard. Even in a philosophy class, we don't have much (or any, really) time to go over writing techniques. There simply too much material to get to. Even still, writing is not arbitraty. Learning how to be a better writer enables you to be a better thinker, because writing is simply a different form of thinking. Further, it can make you a better reader. You'll be able to notice various structures and devices of authors that allow you a better window into their intent.